Achieving excellence in the pharmaceutical care of the surgical patient. / Hacia la excelencia en la atención farmacéutica al paciente quirúrgico.

The perioperative setting is one of the hospital areas with the highest prevalence of medication errors. Despite the wide experience of hospital pharmacists in developing medication safety programs and improvement initiatives, the surgical environment has remained one of the areas in which there is less experience. Clinical pharmacist should be integrated into the multidisciplinary care teams so that they can be involved in the different surgical phases of care, which include from the preoperative assessment to inpatient stay, and finally discharge from hospital. Their work will consist of coordinating and implementing strategies that have been demonstrated to reduce medication errors throughout the perioperative process. The aim of this paper is to introduce a specialized pharmaceutical care program to achieve excellence in the pharmaceutical care of surgical patients. This program is especially aimed at promoting the figure of the clinical pharmacist in the perioperative setting to guarantee the highest quality and safety in pharmacotherapeutic care throughout all the surgical phases of care.

[Translated article] Achieving excellence in the pharmaceutical care of the surgical patient.

The perioperative setting is one of the hospital areas with the highest prevalence of medication errors. Despite the wide experience of hospital pharmacists in developing medication safety programs and improvement initiatives, the perioperative setting has remained one of the areas in which there is less experience. Clinical pharmacist should be integrated into the multidisciplinary care team so that they can be involved in the different surgical phases of care, which include from the preoperative assessment to inpatient stay, and finally discharge from hospital. Their work will consist of coordinating and implementing strategies that have been demonstrated to reduce medication errors during the perioperative process. The aim of this paper is to introduce a specialized pharmaceutical care program to achieve excellence in the pharmaceutical care of surgical patients. This program is especially aimed at promoting the figure of the clinical pharmacist in the perioperative setting to guarantee the highest quality and safety in pharmacotherapeutic care throughout all the surgical phases of care.

Hacia la excelencia en la atención farmacéutica al paciente quirúrgico / Achieving excellence in the pharmaceutical care of the surgical patient

El proceso quirúrgico es una de las áreas del hospital con más prevalencia de errores de medicación. A pesar de la amplia experiencia del farmacéutico en el desarrollo de prácticas seguras de utilización de los medicamentos, el bloque quirúrgico ha sido una de las áreas en las que menos experiencia existe.El farmacéutico especialista debe integrarse en el equipo multidisciplinar, de tal forma que pueda estar presente en todas las etapas de atención al enfermo (prehospitalización, precirugía, intracirugía, postcirugía y alta). Su función será coordinar y diseñar la puesta en marcha de diferentes estrategias que han demostrado reducir el riesgo de errores de medicación durante todo el proceso perioperatorio.El objetivo del presente trabajo es presentar un programa de atención farmacéutica especializada para alcanzar la excelencia en la atención farmacéutica del paciente quirúrgico. Este programa está dirigido especialmente a visibilizar la figura del farmacéutico en el entorno perioperatorio, para que pueda colaborar en garantizar una atención farmacoterapéutica de máxima calidad y seguridad en todas las etapas. (AU)

The perioperative setting is one of the hospital areas with the highest prevalence of medication errors. Despite the wide experience of hospital pharmacists in developing medication safety programs and improvement initiatives, the surgical environment has remained one of the areas in which there is less experience.Clinical pharmacist should be integrated into the multidisciplinary care teams so that they can be involved in the different surgical phases of care, which include from the preoperative assessment to inpatient stay, and finally discharge from hospital. Their work will consist of coordinating and implementing strategies that have been demonstrated to reduce medication errors throughout the perioperative process.The aim of this paper is to introduce a specialized pharmaceutical care program to achieve excellence in the pharmaceutical care of surgical patients. This program is especially aimed at promoting the figure of the clinical pharmacist in the perioperative setting to guarantee the highest quality and safety in pharmacotherapeutic care throughout all the surgical phases of care. (AU)

Medication guide for the perioperative management of oral antineoplastic agents in cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Oral antineoplastic agents (OAAs) are high-risk drugs that may increase the risk of bleeding, difficulty in wound healing, or produce alterations in coagulation and/or platelet aggregation. These aspects had to be highly considered throughout the entire perioperative process. Our aim was to create a comprehensive management medication guide based on reconciliation and dose adjustment recommendations for OAAs in patients undergoing a surgical intervention. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed all OAAs approved by the EMA in November 2020. We assessed data related to dose adjustment, drug reconciliation, coagulation disturbances, or anticoagulant interactions from the FDA and EMA summary of product characteristics. RESULTS: We analyzed 67 OAAs. We identified that 51 (76.2%) OAAs can produce alteration in the platelet count, 12 (17.9%) affect the wound healing and recovery process, and 32 (47.8%) require control and monitoring in case of combination with anticoagulants. Only 13 (19.4%) OAAs, most of them antiangiogenics, have specific recommendations for temporary suspension before surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Most OAAs require perioperative monitoring. This review can serve as an easy (simple, effective) tool to help healthcare professionals involved in patient care to manage OAAs during the perioperative process.

Clinical course of severe patients with COVID-19 treated with tocilizumab: report from a cohort study in Spain.

Background: We report the long-term outcomes, changes in laboratory parameters, the incidence of secondary nosocomial infections and treatment cost of a Spanish cohort of patients with severe COVID-19 that received tocilizumab (TCZ).Methods: Retrospective cohort of PCR confirmed adult patients who received TCZ from March 1 to 24, 2020 in a tertiary hospital was analyzed. Patients were followed up until 10 May 2020.Results: We included 162 patients (median age 64 years; 70.4% male). At time of TCZ administration, 48.1% of patients were on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Over a median follow-up of 53 days, 46.9% of patients were discharge in good conditions and 19.8% were still hospitalized. The overall mortality was 33.3%, being higher in patients on IMV than those who did not (46.2% vs 26.7%, P < 0.001). A significant improvement in the lymphocyte count, C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, and D-dimer was observed. Overall, 43.2% patients presented nosocomial infections, causing death in 8%. Infections were more prevalent in ICU units (63.0% vs 17.1%, P < 0.001). The total cost of TCZ was €371,784.Conclusions: Among the patients who used TCZ, one third died, regardless the improvement in some inflammatory biomarkers. The incidence of secondary nosocomial infections was high.

¿Estamos sobredosificando el metamizol por vía parenteral? / Are we overdosing parenteral metamizole?

No disponible

COVID-19 in hospitalised patients in Spain: a cohort study in Madrid.

Few large series describe the clinical characteristics, outcomes and costs of COVID-19 in Western countries. This cohort reports the first 1255 adult cases receiving anti-COVID-19 treatment at a Spanish hospital (1-24 March 2020). Treatment costs were calculated. A logistic regression model was used to explore risk factors on admission associated with ARDS. A bivariate Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) model was employed to determine the HR between individual factors and death. We included 1255 patients (median age 65 years; 57.8% male), of which 92.3% required hospitalisation. The prevalence of hypertension, cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus (DM) was 45.1%, 31.4% and 19.9%, respectively. Lymphocytopenia (54.8%), elevated alanine aminotransferase (33.0%) and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (58.5%) were frequent. Overall, 36.7% of patients developed ARDS, 10.0% were admitted to an ICU and 21.3% died. The most frequent antiviral combinations were lopinavir/ritonavir plus hydroxychloroquine (44.2%), followed by triple therapy with interferon beta-1b (32.7%). Corticosteroids and tocilizumab were used in 25.3% and 12.9% of patients, respectively. Total cost of anti-COVID-19 agents was €511 825 (€408/patient). By multivariate analysis, risk factors associated with ARDS included older age, obesity, DM, severe hypoxaemia, lymphocytopenia, increased creatine kinase and increased C-reactive protein. In multivariate Cox model, older age (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.06-1.09), cardiovascular disease (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.01-1.79), DM (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.09-1.92), severe hypoxaemia (HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.49-2.72), lymphocytopenia (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.20-2.20) and increased C-reactive protein (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.06) were risk factors for mortality.

Potential drug interactions between targeted oral antineoplastic agents and concomitant medication in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to analyze potential drug interactions (PDIs) between targeted OAAs and concomitant therapy in clinical practice. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was performed in cancer outpatients who started treatment with a targeted OAA between 1 December 2015 and 31 May 2019. PDIs were analyzed using the Lexicomp® and the database About Herbs®. PDIs were classified according to severity, risk, and reliability ratings and their underlying mechanism. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify risk factors associated with PDIs. RESULTS: A total of 881 patients were included, of whom 50.9% had at least 1 PDI between the OAA and the concomitant medication. The factors associated with a higher risk of PDIs were polypharmacy (≥5 concomitant medicines) (OR = 3.64 (2.54-5.20), p < 0.001), type of tumor (prostate cancer [OR = not available, p < 0.001], chronic myelogenous leukemia [OR = 5.10 (1.08-24.05), p = 0.040], sarcoma [OR = 4.97 (1.05-23.55), p = 0.043]), and treatment with hormone therapies (OR = not available, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A search of PDIs should be prioritized, especially in patients receiving targeted OAAs with risk factors, such as polymedication, prostate cancer, chronic myelogenous leukemia, sarcoma, and treatment with hormone therapies.

Hepatitis C virus infection and the role of a pharmaceutical care program.

PURPOSE: The design, implementation, and assessment of a comprehensive pharmaceutical care program (CPCP) for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients treated with direct-acting antivirals (DAA) are described. SUMMARY: The advent of DAA regimens has caused the evolution of the role of hospital pharmacists, leading to the development of more specialized models of pharmaceutical care. Three clinical pharmacists were incorporated into the pharmacy department of a general tertiary teaching hospital in Madrid, Spain, with the aim of developing and implementing a CPCP for HCV-infected patients. Pharmacists were responsible for proposing standards and local guidelines to physicians, monitoring adherence to guidelines, managing drug interactions and adverse drug events (ADEs), providing patient education, and evaluating health outcomes and costs. Implementation steps included (1) estimation of the healthcare demand and pharmacy resources, (2) definition of the workflow of the CPCP, (3) definition of the treatment care plan, for which tools were developed to support pharmaceutical validation, detection, and management of ADEs and drug-drug interactions, and (4) program assessment in terms of safety and cost-effectiveness. The pharmacists' interventions performed, severity of errors intercepted, and patients' satisfaction with the CPCP were also assessed. This CPCP demonstrates that the involvement of the pharmacist throughout the care plan prevents harmful medication errors in this population (0.1 per patient) and prompts significant cost savings (€1.2 million for 1,930 treated patients). CONCLUSION: The implementation of a CPCP developed by hospital pharmacists for patients treated with DAA for HCV infection is an effective approach for preventing harmful medication errors and improving cost- effectiveness.

Oral antineoplastic agents: assessment of safety and dose adjustments in clinical practice.

Objectives: Although the safety profile of oral antineoplastic agents (OAAs) is better than that of classic chemotherapy, the rate of severe adverse events (AEs) is high. The objective was to assess the reasons for adjustments to treatment with OAAs during the first 100 days of treatment. Methods: The authors performed a prospective observational study of cancer outpatients who initiated OAAs between November 2015 and October 2017. Dose reductions and treatment interruptions were closely followed-up during the first 100 days after the beginning of treatment with an OAA. The authors described the different safety profile of different OAA classes. Results: The authors included 443 patients (31 different OAA assessed), of whom 53.0% required their OAA to be adjusted during the first 100 days of treatment. A total of 151 patients required dose reductions and/or interruptions of OAAs owing to AEs. The authors identified 203 AEs in these patients. Treatment with sorafenib, lower ECOG performance status, and first-line treatment were associated with a higher proportion of treatment adjustments due to AEs. Conclusion: These results in clinical practice could be a first approach to help healthcare professionals to design patient monitoring programs by identifying priority patients and drugs, and remarks the importance of pharmacovigilance in OAAs.

Trends in hospital consumption of analgesics after the implementation of a pain performance improvement plan / Tendências no consumo hospitalar de analgésicos após a implantação de plano de melhoria do controle da dor

Abstract Background: Pain management committee established a pain performance improvement plan in 2012. Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess the trends in analgesic consumption in a tertiary teaching hospital and the associated economic impact. Methods: A descriptive, retrospective study was conducted between 2011 and 2015. The analysis included: anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products non-steroids, opioid analgesics and other analgesics and antipyretics. Data are converted into DDD/100 bed-days to analyze consumption trends. Main outcome measure: assessment of the analgesic consumption after the implementation of a pain performance improvement plan. Results: Overall, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products consumption decreased in 24.8 DDD/100 bed-days (-28.3%), accounting for most of the total analgesic consumption decrease (-13%) and total cost (-44.3%). Opioid consumption increased markedly from 22.3 DDD/100 bed-days in 2011 to 26.5 DDD/100 bed-days in 2015 (+18.9%). In 2011, the most consumed opioid was morphine (8.6 DDD/100 bed-days). However, there was an increasing trend in fentanyl consumption (from 8.1 to 12.1 DDD/100 bed-days in 2015), which resulted in fentanyl replacing morphine from the most consumed opioid in 2015 (12.1 DDD/100 bed-days). In 2015, the group of other analgesics and antipyretics represented 46.2% of the total analgesic consumption. Acetaminophen was the most commonly consumed analgesic drug (53.2 DDD/100 bed-days in 2015) and had the highest total cost, it represented 55.4% of the overall cost in 2015. Conclusion: Opioid consumption showed an increasing trend during the 5 year period, with fentanyl replacing morphine as the most used opioid. In general, analgesics diminished use was due to the decreasing trend of consumption of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products.

Resumo Justificativa: A Comissão para o Manejo da Dor estabeleceu um plano de melhoria no controle da dor em 2012. Objetivo: Avaliar as tendências do consumo de analgésicos em um hospital de ensino terciário e o impacto econômico associado. Métodos: Estudo descritivo, retrospectivo, feito entre 2011 e 2015. A análise incluiu: produtos anti-inflamatórios e antirreumáticos não esteroides, analgésicos opioides e outros analgésicos e antipiréticos. Os dados foram convertidos em DDD/100 leitos-dia para analisar as tendências de consumo. Principal medida do desfecho: avaliação do consumo de analgésicos após o estabelecimento de um plano de melhoria no controle da dor. Resultados: O consumo total de produtos anti-inflamatórios e antirreumáticos não esteroides diminuiu em 24,8 DDD/100 leitos-dia (-28,3%), representando a maior parte da redução total do consumo de analgésicos (-13%) e o custo total (-44,3%). O consumo global de opioides aumentou acentuadamente de 22,3 DDD/100 leitos-dia em 2011 para 26,5 DDD/100 leitos-dia em 2015 (+18,9%). Em 2011, o opioide mais consumido foi a morfina (8,6 DDD/100 leitos-dia). No entanto, houve uma tendência crescente no consumo de fentanil (de 8,1 para 12,1 DDD/100 leitos-dia em 2015), o que resultou na substituição de morfina por fentanil como o opioide mais consumido em 2015 (12,1 DDD/100 leitos-dia). Em 2015, o grupo dos outros analgésicos e antipiréticos representou 46,2% do consumo total de analgésicos. Acetaminofeno foi o analgésico mais consumido (53,2 DDD/100 leitos-dia em 2015) e teve o maior custo total, representou 55,4% do custo total em 2015. Conclusão: O consumo de opioides mostrou uma tendência crescente durante o período de cinco anos, fentanil substituiu morfina como o opioide mais usado. Em geral, o uso diminuído de analgésicos foi devido à tendência decrescente do consumo de produtos anti-inflamatórios e antirreumáticos não esteroides.

[Trends in hospital consumption of analgesics after the implementation of a pain performance improvement plan]. / Tendências no consumo hospitalar de analgésicos após a implantação de plano de melhoria do controle da dor.

BACKGROUND: Pain management committee established a pain performance improvement plan in 2012. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the trends in analgesic consumption in a tertiary teaching hospital and the associated economic impact. METHODS: A descriptive, retrospective study was conducted between 2011 and 2015. The analysis included: anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products non-steroids, opioid analgesics and other analgesics and antipyretics. Data are converted into DDD/100 bed-days to analyze consumption trends. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: assessment of the analgesic consumption after the implementation of a pain performance improvement plan. RESULTS: Overall, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products consumption decreased in 24.8 DDD/100 bed-days (-28.3%), accounting for most of the total analgesic consumption decrease (-13%) and total cost (-44.3%). Opioid consumption increased markedly from 22.3 DDD/100 bed-days in 2011 to 26.5 DDD/100 bed-days in 2015 (+18.9%). In 2011, the most consumed opioid was morphine (8.6 DDD/100 bed-days). However, there was an increasing trend in fentanyl consumption (from 8.1 to 12.1 DDD/100 bed-days in 2015), which resulted in fentanyl replacing morphine from the most consumed opioid in 2015 (12.1 DDD/100 bed-days). In 2015, the group of other analgesics and antipyretics represented 46.2% of the total analgesic consumption. Acetaminophen was the most commonly consumed analgesic drug (53.2 DDD/100 bed-days in 2015) and had the highest total cost, it represented 55.4% of the overall cost in 2015. CONCLUSION: Opioid consumption showed an increasing trend during the 5 year period, with fentanyl replacing morphine as the most used opioid. In general, analgesics diminished use was due to the decreasing trend of consumption of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products.

Cancellations of elective surgical procedures due to inadequate management of chronic medications.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES: Inadequate management of chronic medication puts patients at risk and causes unnecessary suspension of surgical procedures. The objective of the study was to calculate the rate of cancellation of elective surgical procedures due to inadequate management of chronic medications and to analyse the underlying causes of cancellation. METHODS: We designed an analytic, observational, retrospective study of all elective surgical procedures performed from July to October 2017 in a tertiary hospital. The main variable was the percentage of surgeries cancelled owing to inadequate management of chronic medications. Other variables recorded included demographic characteristics, time between the preanaesthesia evaluation and surgery, drug involved, and the reason for incorrect management of the medication. RESULTS: During the study period, 5415 surgical procedures were programmed, and 793 (14.6%) were cancelled. Cancellations due to inadequate patient preparation accounted for 5.3% (42 cases), and 19 were related to incorrect medication management (2.4% of the total number of cancellations). The 19 patients, who were mostly men (73.7%), had a median age of 76 years (IQR 68-81). The drugs involved were acenocoumarol (6), enoxaparin (4), clopidogrel (4), direct-acting oral anticoagulants (2), acetylsalicylic acid (1), tocilizumab (1) and leflunomide (1). The reasons for drug mishandling were poor understanding of the anaesthesiology recommendations (15) and lack of a preanaesthesia evaluation (4). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Inadequate management of chronic medications (2.4%) is not the most frequent reason for cancellation, although it is one of the easiest to avoid. Based on our results, starting in October 2017, the Pharmacy Department began to offer a pharmaceutical service to patients with doubts about the preoperative management of chronic medications.

Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir as treatment of hepatitis C virus genotype 5 infection: Two case reports / Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir para el tratamiento de la infección por genotipo 5 del virus de hepatitis C: descripción de dos casos

No disponible

Twelve weeks of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/r and dasabuvir without ribavirin is effective and safe in the treatment of patients with HCV genotype 1b infection and compensated cirrhosis: results from a real-world cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effectiveness and safety of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir (OBV/PTV/r+DSV) for 12 weeks without ribavirin in adults with chronic HCV genotype 1b infection and compensated cirrhosis. METHODS: Observational study of a prospective cohort of adult patients with HCV genotype 1b infection and compensated cirrhosis who received 12 weeks of OBV/PTV/r and DSV without ribavirin. Effectiveness was assessed by recording the percentage of patients achieving sustained virological response at week 12 post-treatment (SVR12). Safety outcomes were based on the incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were included. The SVR12 rate was 96.1% (95%CI 89.2-99.2). Adverse events were recorded in 78.0% of patients. Of these, 97.7% were grade 1/2. One patient discontinued treatment prematurely owing to adverse events. Eighty-six interactions were detected in 43 patients (55.1%). Overall, 81.4% of interactions required close monitoring, alteration of drug dosage, or timing of administration. In 7.0% of cases, the interactions arose from contraindications that required the suspension of the concomitant drug. In 11.6% of cases, medicinal plants or foods were withdrawn. CONCLUSIONS: The simplified regimen of OBV/PTV/r+DSV administered for 12 weeks is effective and safe in patients with chronic HCV genotype 1b infection and compensated cirrhosis. No adverse reactions related to drug-drug interactions were recorded.

Improving pharmacotherapy outcomes in patients with hepatitis C virus infection treated with direct-acting antivirals: The GRUviC project.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Pharmaceutical care is needed in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients treated with direct-acting antivirals (DAA). We describe the implementation of a comprehensive pharmaceutical care programme (CPCP) for HCV-infected patients treated with DAA in a tertiary-care hospital and provide data about health outcomes and costs. METHODS: Quasi-experimental study between 1 April 2015 and 30 June 2016. A group of hospital pharmacists collaborating on HCV infection implemented interventional measures for validation of drug prescriptions, detection of clinically relevant drug-drug interactions and adverse drug events (ADEs), and patient education. Quality, health and cost-effectiveness outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 1070 patients were enrolled. Pharmacists made 327 interventions that led to the prevention of 299 (91.4%) medication errors, 16 of which were grade G-H (NCC MERP classification). The main reasons for the pharmacist's intervention were management of 143 drug-drug interactions. The overall sustained virologic response at week 12 posttreatment (SVR12) rate was 93.0% (95% CI 91.4-94.6). The SVR12 was higher than 90.0% in all populations, except in genotype 3 patients (86.0%, 95% CI 78.7-93.9), decompensated cirrhotic patients (81.1%, 95% CI 69.7-92.6) and transplant recipients (86.8%, 95% CI 76.7-96.9). ADEs occurred in 85.5% of the study patients, but only 1.0% (11 patients) experienced an ADE that led to premature discontinuation. The total cost of treatment was €18 279 225 (€17 083 per patient). The most cost-effective treatment was selected in 93.1% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a CPCP developed by hospital pharmacists in patients treated with DAAs for HCV infection is an effective approach that improves patient safety and education. The active involvement of the pharmacist in improving adherence to local guidelines promoted the selection of the most cost-effective treatment in the majority of cases.

Effectiveness and Safety of Ombitasvir-Paritaprevir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir With or Without Ribavirin for HCV Genotype 1 Infection for 12 Weeks Under Routine Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: No previous studies exist examining the effectiveness and safety in real clinical practice of the combination of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir (OBV/PTV/r+DSV). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety in real clinical practice of the combination of OBV/PTV/r+DSV with or without ribavirin for 12 weeks in treatment-naïve and previously treated adult patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection. METHODS: This was an observational study of a prospective cohort of treatment-naïve and pretreated adult patients who received 12 weeks of OBV/PTV/r (25/150/100 mg once daily) and DSV (250 mg twice daily) with or without ribavirin. The primary effectiveness outcome was sustained virological response 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12). Safety outcomes were presented by the incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 116 of 121 patients achieved a SVR12 (95.9%, 95% CI = 90.6-98.6). The SVR12 rate was 93.8% (95% CI = 86.0-97.9) in cirrhotic patients and 100% (95% CI = 91.4-100.0) in noncirrhotic patients. Adverse events occurred in 91.7% of patients, of which 81.8% were grade 1/2, and none led to premature discontinuation. Grade 3 adverse events were reported in 9.9% of patients. The most frequent adverse event was anemia (52.1%), although only 1.6% had a hemoglobin level below 8 g/dL. The incidence of any adverse event was higher in the group of patients who received ribavirin (96.5% vs 80.0%, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of OBV/PTV/r+DSV with or without ribavirin for 12-week settings achieved a high rate of SVR12, with an acceptable safety profile in routine clinical care.